QT 2.3.2 vs 3.x with newest seq

[shadowcat]

I was wondering if with the new version of seq whether people are noticing whether it is better to stick with 2.3.2 or to upgrade to 3.0.5, .6, or higher of QT?

[fryfrog]

in the past, people have found that while qt-3.0.x WORKS, qt-2.3.2 works better. i am fairly sure that nothing significant has changed on the qt / interface side of things so this is probably still the case.

only one way to find out really :)

[domesticbeer]

I have 3.05 and Seq works great. Dont see any lag at all.

[wfj5444]

I asked about this as well in previous posts, and the consensus is 3.0.5 works but if the zone doesn't decode, you can't see yourself on the map.

With 2.3.2 you can.

[shadowcat]

I had a problem with 3.0.5 not being recognized on my rh 8.0 system so I grabbed the 2.3.2 tar and built that version. seq configured fine after that.

Yes, I read the previous posting on 2.3.2 vs 3.0.5 and I decided on 2.3.2 because of that posting.

[domesticbeer]

Hmm odd I have 3.05 and even if the zone does not decode and I get unknowns I stll see myself on the map.